|







 |
|
CAR
2008 Forcast |
|
CAR August Report
|
| NAR Market
Conditions |
| Income Tax Time: Value
of Homeownership |
|
C.A.R.'s California
Housing Market Forecast for
2008:Statewide median price
down, pace of sales decline
moderates after tumultuous
2007 LOS
ANGELES (Oct. 10) – Home
prices throughout most of
California will post modest
declines next year while
sales of existing homes will
stabilize from the
precipitous decrease
experienced in 2007,
according to the CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.)
"2008 California Housing
Market Forecast" released
today. The forecast will be
presented this afternoon
during the CALIFORNIA
REALTOR® EXPO 2007 (www.realtorexpo.org),
running from Oct. 9-11 at
the Anaheim Convention
Center in Anaheim, Calif.
The trade show attracts
nearly 12,000 attendees and
is the largest state real
estate trade show in the
nation.
The median home price in
California will decline 4
percent to $553,000 in 2008
compared with a projected
median of $576,000 this
year, while sales for 2008
are projected to decrease 9
percent to 334,500 units,
compared with 367,500 units
(projected) in 2007.
“Tighter credit
standards, affordability
concerns, and a continued
standoff between buyers and
sellers will contribute to
continued weakness in the
market going into next
year,” said C.A.R. President
Colleen Badagliacco. “Now is
not the time for homeowners
to ‘test the waters’ – only
serious sellers should put
their homes on the market in
what will continue to be a
challenging sales
environment.”
“Sales could decline more
steeply in 2008 if the
current liquidity crunch in
the mortgage markets has a
longer-than-expected
duration or if interest
rates unexpectedly
increase,” she said
“Geographically, more
affordable regions such as
the Central Valley and
Inland Empire will
experience greater softness
in the resale market because
of the large number of new
homes coming onto the market
in recent years,” said C.A.R.
Vice President and Chief
Economist Leslie
Appleton-Young. “Higher
priced regions of the state,
such as the San Francisco
Bay Area and parts of San
Diego, Los Angeles, and
Orange counties will react
more to affordability
constraints.”
“By price-range, the
highest-priced markets –
those with medians over $1
million -- will show less
stress,” she said. “The
lower-priced markets will
continue to face fallout
from the subprime crisis,
tighter underwriting
standards, and competition
from new home developments
where price-cutting has been
even more severe.”
C.A.R. economists also
projected a 23 percent
decline in sales this year
to 367,500 units compared
with 2006, and a 3.5 percent
increase in the statewide
median price to $576,000.
However, the projected
increase in the 2007
statewide median stands in
contrast to the situation in
most counties, regions, and
communities of the state,
where slight to modest
year-to-year percentage
declines have become more
prevalent and will continue
next year.
Historically, the last
time the sales level fell
below 2007’s projected
367,500 units occurred in
1995, when annual sales
totaled 342,540 units. Sales
last fell below 2008’s
334,500-unit forecast in
1985, with 328,270 units.
The last time the statewide
median price fell was a 0.5
percent decline in 1996. The
most recent statewide median
price decline greater than 4
percent was a 4.5 percent
decline in 1993.
Leading the way...® in
California real estate for
more than 100 years, the
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
REALTORS® (www.car.org)
is one of the largest state
trade organizations in the
United States, with nearly
200,000 members dedicated to
the advancement of
professionalism in real
estate. C.A.R. is
headquartered in Los
Angeles.
2008
FORECAST FACT SHEET
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
Forecast |
|
|
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007f |
2008f |
|
SFH Resales (000s) |
601.8 |
624.7 |
625.0 |
477.5 |
367.5 |
334.5 |
|
% Change |
5.1% |
3.8% |
0.04% |
-23.6% |
-23.0% |
-9.0% |
|
Median Price ($000) |
$372.7 |
$450.8 |
$524.0 |
$556.6 |
$576.0 |
$553.0 |
|
% Change |
17.9% |
20.9% |
16.2% |
6.2% |
3.5% |
-4.0% |
|
30-Yr FRM |
5.8% |
5.8% |
5.9% |
6.4% |
6.5% |
6.5% |
|
1-Yr ARM |
3.8% |
3.9% |
4.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.2% |
PRICE
VARIABILITY IN REGIONAL
MARKETS
|
C.A.R. REGION |
Peak Month |
Peak Price |
Aug-07 Median |
%
Chg From Peak |
|
Northern California |
Aug-05 |
$440,420 |
$370,390 |
-15.9% |
|
Sacramento |
Aug-05 |
$394,450 |
$332,510 |
-15.7% |
|
Central Valley |
Aug-05 |
$363,680 |
$309,740 |
-14.8% |
|
High Desert |
Apr-06 |
$334,860 |
$287,390 |
-14.2% |
|
Riverside San
Bernardino |
Jan-07 |
$415,160 |
$377,130 |
-9.2% |
|
Northern Wine
Country |
Jan-06 |
$645,080 |
$600,000 |
-7.0% |
|
Ventura |
Aug-06 |
$710,910 |
$669,870 |
-5.8% |
|
Orange County |
Apr-07 |
$747,260 |
$710,380 |
-4.9% |
|
San Diego |
May-06 |
$622,380 |
$595,070 |
-4.4% |
|
Palm Springs/Lwer
Desert |
Jun-05 |
$393,370 |
$377,920 |
-3.9% |
|
San Luis Obispo |
Jun-06 |
$620,540 |
$598,400 |
-3.6% |
|
San Francisco |
May-07 |
$853,910 |
$832,760 |
-2.5% |
|
Santa Clara |
Apr-07 |
$868,410 |
$860,000 |
-1.0% |
|
Monterey Region |
Aug-07 |
$798,210 |
$798,210 |
0.0% |
|
Los Angeles |
Aug-07 |
$605,300 |
$605,300 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2007
C.A.R. reports
sales decrease 27.8 percent in August, entry-level
median home price falls 5. 1 percent
LOS ANGELES
(Sept. 25) – Home sales decreased 27.8 percent in August
in California compared with the same period a year ago,
while the median price of an existing home increased 2
percent, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.)
reported today.
"Despite the
overall increase in the statewide median price, prices
declined in 11 regions last month, falling 11.5 percent
in the Central Valley region and 12.1 percent in
Sacramento," said C.A.R. President Colleen Badagliacco.
"Price softness is even more pronounced when we look at
different segments of the market. For example, the
statewide median price in the entry-level price range of
less than $500,000 fell 5.1 percent in August to
$349,360 compared with $368,210 for the same period a
year ago.
"The median price per square
foot for a single-family home is also on the decline,
falling 4.3 percent this year to $336 compared with last
year’s record high of $351 per square-foot," she said.
Closed escrow
sales of existing, single-family detached homes in
California totaled 319,200 in August at a seasonally
adjusted annualized rate, according to information
collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR®
associations statewide. Statewide home resale activity
decreased 27.8 percent from the 442,150 sales pace
recorded in August 2006.
The statewide
sales figure represents what the total number of homes
sold during 2007 would be if sales maintained the August
pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for
seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.
The median
price of an existing, single-family detached home in
California during August 2007 was $588,970, a 2 percent
increase over the revised $577,300 median for August
2006, C.A.R. reported. The August 2007 median price
increased 0.5 percent compared with July’s $586,030
median price.
"While low affordability,
tighter underwriting standards and expectations of lower
prices continue to pose challenges for the market, the
decline in sales accelerated in August as a result of
the so-called credit or liquidity crunch that began in
July.," said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist
Leslie Appleton-Young. "The credit crunch emerged as
uncertainty about the extent of the subprime problem
drove investors across the globe to turn off the tap of
funds to lenders in mortgage and other credit market
segments. With credit drying up, even qualified buyers
were unable to receive funding for home purchases."
"We expect the impact of the
credit crunch to play out over the next several months,
and that it will continue to negatively impact sales,"
she said.
Highlights of
C.A.R.’s resale housing figures for August 2007:
C.A.R.’s Unsold Inventory Index for existing,
single-family detached homes in August 2007 was
11.8 months, compared with 5.9 months (revised)
for the same period a year ago. The index
indicates the number of months needed to deplete
the supply of homes on the market at the current
sales rate.
Thirty-year fixed-mortgage interest rates
averaged 6.57 percent during August 2007,
compared with 6.52 percent in August 2006,
according to Freddie Mac. Adjustable-mortgage
interest rates averaged 5.67 percent in August
2007 compared with 5.64 percent in August 2006.
The
median number of days it took to sell a
single-family home was 55.5 days in August 2007,
compared with 50.9 days (revised) for the same
period a year ago.
Regional MLS
sales and price information is contained in the tables
that accompany this press release. Regional sales data
are not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that
can influence home sales. The MLS median price and sales
data for detached homes are generated from a survey of
more than 90 associations of REALTORSâ
throughout
the state. MLS median price and sales data for
condominiums are based on a survey of more than 60
associations. The median price for both detached homes
and condominiums represents closed escrow sales.
In a separate
report covering more localized statistics generated by
C.A.R. and DataQuick Information Systems, 24.6 percent,
or 88 out of 357 cities and communities, showed an
increase in their respective median home prices from a
year ago. DataQuick statistics are based on county
records data rather than MLS information. DataQuick
Information Systems is a subsidiary of Vancouver-based
MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates. (The top 10 lists
are generated for incorporated cities with a minimum of
30 recorded sales in the month.)
Note: Large changes in local
median home prices typically indicate both local home
price appreciation, and often, large shifts in the
composition of housing market activity. Some of the
variations in median home prices for August may be
exaggerated due to compositional changes in housing
demand.
Statewide, the 10
cities and communities with the highest median
home prices in California during August 2007
were: Los Altos, $1,815,750; Manhattan Beach,
$1,700,000; Saratoga, $1,620,000; Newport Beach,
$1,550,000; Burlingame, $1,505,000; Palos Verdes
Estates, $1,450,250; Calabasas, $1,330,000; La
Canada/Flintridge, $1,317,500; Coronado,
$1,315,000; Los Gatos, $1,255,000.
Statewide, the 10 cities and communities with
the greatest median home price increases in
August 2007 compared with the same period a year
ago were: West Hollywood, 35.8 percent; Los
Gatos, 35.7 percent; Encinitas, 27.7 percent;
Los Altos, 26.2 percent; San Carlos, 21.9
percent; Los Angeles, 20.9 percent; Newport
Beach, 18.3 percent; Burlingame, 18.3 percent;
Cupertino, 17.4 percent; Novato, 17 percent;
Santa Monica, 16.8 percent.
Leading the way...® in
California real estate for more than 100 years, the
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org)
is one of
the largest state trade organizations in the United
States, with more than 185,000 members dedicated to the
advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is
headquartered in Los Angeles.
August 2007
Regional Sales and Price Activity*
Regional and
Condo Sales Data Not Seasonally Adjusted
|
|
Median Price |
Percent Change in Price
from Prior Month |
|
Percent Change in Price
from Prior Year |
|
Percent Change in Sales
from Prior Month |
Percent Change in Sales
from Prior Year |
|
|
Aug-07 |
Jul-07 |
|
Aug-06 |
|
Jul-07 |
Aug-06 |
|
Statewide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calif. (sf) |
$588,970 |
0.5% |
|
2.0% |
|
-9.1% |
-27.8% |
|
Calif. (condo) |
$420,940 |
-3.2% |
|
-3.1% |
|
-2.4% |
-23.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.A.R. Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Valley |
$309,740 |
-5.2% |
|
-11.5% |
|
1.2% |
-33.8% |
|
High Desert |
$287,390 |
-3.0% |
|
-13.7% |
|
-4.8% |
-56.2% |
|
Los Angeles |
$605,300 |
2.2% |
|
2.6% |
|
1.3% |
-23.9% |
|
Monterey Region |
$798,210 |
6.8% |
|
10.4% |
|
-7.4% |
-32.0% |
|
Monterey County |
$799,500 |
16.7% |
|
18.4% |
|
-9.9% |
-37.1% |
|
Santa Cruz County |
$794,200 |
1.8% |
|
3.8% |
|
-4.9% |
-26.5% |
|
Northern California |
$370,390 |
-4.1% |
|
-6.6% |
|
-5.1% |
-14.4% |
|
Northern Wine Country |
$600,000 |
-1.6% |
|
-1.6% |
|
1.2% |
-25.0% |
|
Orange County |
$710,380 |
0.1% |
|
1.8% |
|
-6.8% |
-20.5% |
|
Palm Springs/Lower Desert |
$377,920 |
-0.1% |
|
6.4% |
|
-2.7% |
-16.8% |
|
Riverside/San Bernardino |
$377,130 |
-4.1% |
|
-7.4% |
|
6.5% |
-47.3% |
|
Sacramento |
$332,510 |
-4.0% |
|
-12.1% |
|
4.0% |
-23.9% |
|
San Diego |
$595,070 |
-1.1% |
|
-0.6% |
|
4.5% |
-17.0% |
|
San Francisco Bay |
$832,760 |
-1.1% |
|
9.9% |
|
-9.0% |
-26.5% |
|
San Luis Obispo |
$598,400 |
2.4% |
|
-0.7% |
|
-15.9% |
-25.9% |
|
Santa Barbara County |
$833,330 |
-6.0% |
|
-0.2% |
|
9.6% |
-24.5% |
|
Santa Barbara South Coast |
$1,262,500 |
7.4% |
|
6.1% |
|
-5.6% |
-22.7% |
|
North Santa Barbara County |
$390,740 |
1.2% |
|
-13.8% |
|
34.0% |
-26.7% |
|
Santa Clara |
$860,000 |
0.4% |
|
11.7% |
|
-10.4% |
-27.1% |
|
Ventura |
$669,870 |
-1.9% |
|
-5.8% |
|
0.2% |
-18.3% |
na – not
available
*Based on
closed escrow sales of single-family, detached homes
only (no condos). Reported month-to-month changes in
sales activity August overstate actual changes because
of the small size of individual regional samples.
Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as
measuring changes in the cost of a standard home. Prices
are influenced by changes in cost and changes in the
characteristics and size of homes actually sold.
sf =
single-family, detached home
Source:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Median Prices By
Region - Current Month vs. Year Ago
|
|
Aug-07 |
Jul-07 |
|
Aug-06 |
|
|
Statewide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calif. (sf) |
$588,970 |
$586,030 |
|
$577,300 |
r |
|
Calif. (condo) |
$420,940 |
$434,640 |
|
$434,470 |
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.A.R. Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Valley |
$309,740 |
$326,600 |
|
$349,890 |
|
|
High Desert |
$287,390 |
$296,220 |
|
$332,900 |
|
|
Los Angeles |
$605,300 |
$592,300 |
|
$589,740 |
|
|
Monterey Region |
$798,210 |
$747,620 |
|
$723,260 |
|
|
Monterey County |
$799,500 |
$685,000 |
|
$675,000 |
|
|
Santa Cruz County |
$794,200 |
$780,000 |
|
$765,000 |
|
|
Northern California |
$370,390 |
$386,030 |
|
$396,390 |
|
|
Northern Wine Country |
$600,000 |
$609,780 |
|
$609,730 |
|
|
Orange County |
$710,380 |
$709,720 |
|
$698,080 |
|
|
Palm Springs/Lower Desert |
$377,920 |
$378,310 |
|
$355,330 |
|
|
Riverside/San Bernardino |
$377,130 |
$393,070 |
|
$407,400 |
|
|
Sacramento |
$332,510 |
$346,220 |
|
$378,180 |
|
|
San Diego |
$595,070 |
$601,730 |
|
$598,580 |
|
|
San Francisco Bay |
$832,760 |
$841,660 |
|
$757,480 |
r |
|
San Luis Obispo |
$598,400 |
$584,510 |
|
$602,850 |
|
|
Santa Barbara County |
$833,330 |
$886,720 |
|
$835,230 |
|
|
Santa Barbara South Coast |
$1,262,500 |
$1,175,000 |
r |
$1,190,000 |
|
|
No. Santa Barbara County |
$390,740 |
$386,110 |
|
$453,490 |
|
|
Santa Clara |
$860,000 |
$856,500 |
|
$770,000 |
|
|
Ventura |
$669,870 |
$682,930 |
|
$710,910 |
|
na - not ava ilable
r - revised
Source: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS®
|
|
|
|
NAR MARKET
CONDITIONS
|
|
One of Every 16
Americans is
Buying a Home
This Year
|
|
Conditions in
the mortgage
market are
improving for
consumers, which
should help
release pent-up
demand in early
2008, according
to the NAR's
latest forecast.
Conforming loans
are abundantly
available at
historically
favorable
mortgage rates.
Pricing has
steadily
improved on
jumbo mortgages
since the August
credit crunch,
and FHA loans
are replacing
subprime
mortgages. NAR
Vice President
of Research, Dr.
Lawrence Yun
noted that 2007
will be the
fifth highest
year on record
for
existing-home
sales. One out
of 16 American
households is
buying a home
this year. Yun
said markets
like Austin,
Salt Lake City
and Raleigh are
performing well.
Look for Denver
and Wichita to
join the pack of
strong
performers.
View forecast
table>
Read Yun's
Latest Forecast>
|
|
They Buy to Own
– No Matter What
the Media Says
|
|
A desire to own
a home of their
own and to
establish a
household is the
most often sited
reason for
purchasing a
home, according
to preliminary
results from
NAR’s Profile of
Home Buyers and
Sellers.
Thirty-three
percent of all
buyers, and a
whopping 70
percent of
first-time
buyers, express
this as their
prime motivator
in the 2007
report,
scheduled for
release in
November. A
job-related
move, desire for
a larger home, a
change in family
situation,
desire for a
home in a better
area and a
desire to be
closer to family
and friends are
also high on the
list of reasons
for purchasing a
home.
Interestingly
enough, taking
advantage of
perfect market
conditions was
not mentioned --
not this year,
last year
or...well...
ever!
Read about last
year's survey
and watch for
the new one>
|
|
Buyers are
Gravitating
Toward Bigger
and Younger
Homes
|
|
The median size
of homes
purchased this
year has grown
to 1,840 square
feet, up from
1,730 in 2004,
according to
NAR's 2007
Profile of
Buyers' Home
Feature
Preferences.
Despite the
increased size,
the median
number of
bedrooms has
dropped --
buyers are
taking the added
space in living
rooms, kitchens,
and family
rooms. At the
same time, the
age of homes
purchased has
dropped from 15
to 12 years old.
This profile is
full of
information
about what
buyers want and
how much they
will pay to get
it.
Read more>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Time: Value
of Homeownership
In the midst of tax
season, the California
Association of REALTORS®
(C.A.R.) has decided to
take a closer look at
the benefits that go
along with
homeownership,
particularly the
consumption and tax
benefits. There are
generally two primary
reasons for owning a
home: for consumption
purposes and for
investment purposes. At
this time of year,
everyone is doing their
tax returns or will have
to do so before April
15th. It is crucial to
reap all of the tax
advantages available to
you as homeowners. We
will take a quick look
at how valuable your
homeownership is and how
it can add to your
bottom line during this
tax season.
Our first look at the
value of homeownership
is the return on
investment alone. Let’s
take a look back. Just
imagine you bought your
home at the median price
five years ago. That
home would have cost you
$227,160 (February 2000
single-family median
home price). In just
five years, the value of
your investment has
skyrocketed to $471,620
(February 2005
single-family median
home price), thus
reaping a 107 percent
gain in the value of
your home. On average
that is a 20 percent per
year return, which is in
and of itself an amazing
return on your
investment in any
circumstances. In fact,
that is nearly 3 times
the nation’s return 7
percent per year over
the same time period.
That return on your
investment does not even
take into account that
the investment also
provides a place to live
for you and your family.
Because this real estate
investment is also your
primary residence, you
have a vested interest
to take the proper care
i.e. renovations,
maintenance, and
repairs, all of which
are necessary in any
real estate investment.
Therefore the benefits
reaped are two-fold: the
improvements made to the
actual structure and
property, and also the
improved quality of
living for you, your
neighborhood, and
community overall.
From a pure investment
standpoint, if you
decided to sell your
home in 2004, $250,000
of that profit or equity
is tax free if you are
single and doubles to
$500,000 if you are
married and file a joint
tax return, as long as
you have lived in the
home for at least 2
years and it is your
primary residence (IRS
Publication 523). Let’s
take a look at the
February 2000 example
again. If you purchased
your home in February
2000 for the then median
price of $227,160 and
decided to sell five
years later in February
2005 for the going
median price of
$471,620. The equity
gain on the sale of your
home would be $244,460
and thus that amount
earned would be
tax-free.
Along with home equity
gains and overall
appreciation, there are
other huge tax
advantages to owning
your own home—interest &
property tax deductions.
Let’s fast forward to
those who have purchased
a home recently. If you
buy a home today at the
February median of
$471,620, and if
property taxes are about
1 percent of the
property value, the
property tax deduction
for that home would be
approximately $4,716 in
your first. In the
first 12 months the
interest paid on that
home loan would total
$21,420 (Interest
calculated assuming a
20% downpayment with
5.71 percent FHFB
February 2005 composite
mortgage rate).
Therefore, if you are in
the 25 percent tax
bracket the total tax
savings in the first
year of owning the home
would be around $6,530
($26,130 interest paid &
property taxes x 25
percent marginal tax
bracket). The IRS allows
you to deduct the entire
amount of interest paid
on your home loan as
long as you complete a
Schedule A on your 1040,
the loan is in your
name, and the mortgage
must be secured by
collateral (usually the
home itself—IRS
Publication 936).
Many homeowners are also
taking advantage of the
ability to consolidate
credit card debt and
roll it into a home
equity loan. The main
advantage to this
approach is being able
to deduct the interest
on the home equity loan
as the first mortgage
deduction rules apply.
Interest on credit card
debt is non-deductible
and the rates charged
are typically higher
than that of the current
rates charged on home
equity loans. By taking
advantage of these types
of perks, homeowners are
able to better handle
their debt and improve
their financial
situations.
Homeowners reap many
advantages when tax
season comes around.
Make sure you squeeze
the most out of your
homeownership as you
can. |
|
|
|
|
|
|